| UPDATE: March 2004
05-04-04
International PolioPlus Committee
Statements on Current Facts and Figures Relative to Polio
Eradication and the Role of Rotary International in the
Global Effort
For the sake of clarity and consistency in all Rotary
publications and information, the
International PolioPlus Committee has adopted the following
set of frequently reported statements, statistics, and terms
concerning the PolioPlus Program and the global polio eradication
effort, and encourages all members in the global partnership
for polio eradication to adopt similarly consistent statements
and figures. The Committee has also requested a wide dissemination
within Rotary for these statements. The Committee reviews
these statements at each meeting, to ensure that they remain
current and appropriate.
1. A statement on the goal of the PolioPlus program:
“The goal of the PolioPlus program is the global certification
of polio eradication. By eradication, WHO, the Global Commission
on Certification and Rotary mean the interruption of the
transmission of the wild poliovirus.”
2. A statement on Rotary International's contribution
to the polio eradication effort:
“By the time the world is certified polio-free, Rotary’s
contributions to the global polio eradication effort will
exceed US$600 million. In addition, millions
of dollars of 'in-kind' and personal contributions have
been made by and through local Rotary clubs and districts
for polio eradication activities. Of even greater significance
has been the huge volunteer army mobilized by Rotary International.
Hundreds of thousands of volunteers at the local level are
providing support at clinics or mobilizing their communities
for immunization or polio eradication activities. More than
one million Rotarians worldwide have contributed toward
the success of the polio eradication effort to date.”
3. A statement on the number of nations benefiting
from PolioPlus grants:
“To date, 122 nations around the world have benefited
from PolioPlus grants for polio immunization and eradication
efforts.”
4. A statement on the number of polio cases prevented
annually through immunization:
“From the launch of the global initiative in 1988,
to the eradication target of 2005, 5 million people, mainly
in the developing world, who would otherwise have been paralyzed,
will be walking because they have been immunized against
polio. More than 500,000 cases of polio are now prevented
each year by the efforts of governments and the partnership
of the World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary International,
the United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United States
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the
overseas development agencies of donor nations.”
5. Statements on the number of children immunized
against polio:
a. Since 1985, when Rotary implemented the PolioPlus program,
through the end of calendar year 2002:
"As a result of the efforts of Rotary International
and its Foundation and those of our partners, more than
two billion children have received oral polio vaccine."
b. record level of immunizations in 2002:
“As part of the global polio eradication effort in
2002, 500 million children were vaccinated during more than
266 activities in 93 countries using two billion doses of
oral polio vaccine.”
6. A statement on the percentage of the world’s children
that live in polio-free countries:
“In 1988, 10% of the world’s children lived
in polio-free countries; as of 1 July 2003, over 70% are
living in polio-free countries.”
7. A statement on the reduction of cases of polio:
“The number of cases of polio has declined by 99%
since Rotary launched the PolioPlus program.”
8. A statement on the cost of vaccine per child:
“A child can be protected against polio for as little
as US$ .60 worth of vaccine.”
9. A statement on the number of polio endemic countries:
“Since Rotary began its PolioPlus Program, the number
of polio endemic countries has declined from over 125 countries
in 1985 to 6 countries at the end of the
year 2003. The number of polio cases has
declined by more than 99% since 1985.
10. A statement on the geographic restriction of
wild poliovirus cases in 2003:
By late 2003, wild poliovirus transmission had been interrupted
in all but six countries in the world. Three of these countries,
Nigeria, India and Pakistan, accounted for 95% of cases.
However, within India, Nigeria and Pakistan, polio is further
geographically restricted, as 75% of all global cases in
2003 were linked to only 5 of the 76 states/provinces of
these three countries.
11. A statement on the number of countries that
are polio-free and the number of people who live in countries,
territories, and areas that have been certified polio-free
by independent commissions:
“Two hundred and ten (210) countries,
territories and areas are now polio-free, and 134 of these
have been certified polio-free by independent commissions.
In June 2002, the
WHO European Region was certified polio-free, joining the
WHO Regions of the Americas and the Western Pacific. More
than three billion people, half the world’s population
lives in the 134 countries, territories and areas that are
now certified polio free.”
12. Statements on polio in India and Nigeria:
a. In India, by the last quarter of 2003, polio was at the
lowest level of transmission ever. With continued attention
to reaching very young children and underserved populations,
particularly in the northern states of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh
and West Bengal, transmission could be interrupted in 2004.
Of particular importance is western Uttar Pradesh, the only
area where transmission has never been interrupted.
b. The greatest risk to the global polio eradication initiative
is Nigeria due to poor quality polio campaigns and the suspension
of key immunization activities in Kano state in 2003. Of
particular concern by late 2003 were data demonstrating
that less than 50% of children in some northern states,
particularly Kano, did not receive an adequate number of
OPV doses. The subsequent polio outbreak led to the spread
of polio to several states in Nigeria and seven neighbouring
countries that had previously been polio-free.
13. A statement on the localization of polio transmission:
By late 2003, wild poliovirus transmission had been interrupted
in all but six countries in the world. Three of these countries,
Nigeria, India and Pakistan, accounted for 95% of cases.
14. A statement on the total donor needs to eradicate polio:
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative launched in January
2004, a Global Polio
Eradication Initiative Strategic Plan 2004-2008. To carry
out this Strategic Plan,
WHO, UNICEF and Ministries of Health estimate that US$765
million is required for the interruption of transmission
of poliovirus worldwide during the period 2004-2005. Of
this US$765 million, US$635 million already has been pledged
or is expected from existing donors. Additional financial
support will be sought from governments and other donors.
Funding will be required for global certification, mainstreaming
of the polio eradication infrastructure and developing products
for OPV cessation, during the period 2006-2008.
The external financial resource requirements have been calculated
by WHO and UNICEF after careful analysis of the costs of
implementing, on a timely basis, the Strategic Plan.
15. A statement on the contribution of Rotary’s
advocacy efforts:
Public Advocacy Efforts:
“In 1995, Rotary International launched a task force
to advocate the cause of polio eradication to donor governments.
This task force, later to be part of the Polio Advocacy
Group, with additional partners, has resulted to date in
more than US$1.5 billion in polio-specific grants from the
public sector. These advocacy efforts are ongoing and will
be continued as necessary.”
16. Definitions of the terms Partners, Spearheading
Partners, Coalitions and Donors are outlined below:
“When used as generic terms to refer to organizations
who are also sharing in work and funds to eradicate polio,
either partners or partnerships is preferred. Generally,
coalition should be used to describe a specific group. Donor
is a term to describe an entity which is providing funds
to eradicate polio and should be limited to those whose
primary or exclusive role is in providing funds. “Donor”
should be avoided in describing Rotary International or
its Foundation.”
“Where partners is used to delineate specific organizations
engaged in global eradication of polio spearheading partners
refers to the World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary
International (RI), the U.S. Centres for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), and the United Nations Children’s
Fund (UNICEF).”
“Rotary is engaged in one specific coalition; that
is the coalition to advocate increased contributions by
the U.S. Government to global polio eradication. The coalition
includes
The Rotary Foundation of R.I., the United Nations
Foundation, the Task Force for
Child Survival and Development, the U.S.
Fund for UNICEF, the American
Academy of Paediatrics and the March of
Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. Rotary is the leader.”
“Rotary is the leading non-governmental contributor.
Whenever possible, most of the polio eradication costs are
borne by the polio-endemic countries themselves. However,
as the battle against polio is taken to the poorest, least-developed
nations on earth, and those in the midst of civil conflict,
up to 100 percent of the NID and other polio eradication
costs must be met by external donor sources.”
“Polio-specific contributions have been made by the
following governments: Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Germany,
Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Switzerland, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the
United States of America.”
17. A statement on global certification:
“Global Certification: An independent commission will
consider global certification when no wild polio virus associated
cases have occurred for at least three years, in the presence
of certification-standard surveillance, and all wild poliomyelitis
stocks have been appropriately contained.”
18. A statement on the cessation of polio immunization:
“Immunization against polio can eventually cease and
substantial savings expected after global certification,
appropriate containment of poliovirus stocks, international
consensus on the future use of oral polio vaccine (OPV),
and stockpiles for use in the unlikely event of a re-introduction
of the poliovirus.”
19. A statement on estimated annual global savings
after cessation of immunization:
"The savings of polio eradication after immunization
has ceased are potentially as high as US$1.5 billion per
year - funds that could be used to address other public
health priorities. This amount does not include the immeasurable
price paid in human suffering by polio victims and their
families.”
20. A statement on the annual cost of immunization
of U.S. children against polio:
“The United States Centres for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than US$350 million
per year is spent on immunizing U.S. children against polio.”
21. A statement on type II wild poliovirus:
“Type II wild poliovirus has not been found since
October 1999, suggesting that transmission of one of the
three types of wild poliovirus may have been interrupted.”
22. A statement on the importations of the poliovirus:
In 2003, there were 35 cases (data as of 11 February 2004)
of paralytic polio following importations of wild poliovirus
into previously polio-free countries (Benin, Burkina Faso,
Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Ghana, Lebanon,
Niger and Togo). In 2003, 34 of these importations were
linked to wild poliovirus originating in northern Nigeria,
and the case in Lebanon was linked to poliovirus originating
in India.
23. A statement on instances of vaccine-derived
polio:
“Between 2000 and mid-2003 there were three episodes
of vaccine-derived poliovirus resulting in 28 polio cases
in Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Philippines, and Madagascar
due to circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus.”
24. A statement on the Vitamin A distribution during
polio National Immunization Days.
“Since 1998, the inclusion of Vitamin A supplements
on NIDs has averted an estimated
1.25 million childhood deaths.”
The Committee further requests that the General Secretary,
in official and public releases and statements, follow the
above expressions. Finally, the Committee requests that
all other RI and TRF officials and spokespersons, and all
organizations which report to the Committee, adhere to the
approved statements and observe the recommended terminology.
|